What do you think of my dinnerware set?

dinnerware set 32 image

Q. It's corelle and all the reviews I've read on it were great. I have been trying to find a green set and have had SUCH difficulty.. I guess green just isn't as popular. I'm buying the same ones as below but off of overstock.. if you know a site where I can get a green dinnerware set cheaper than 32 dollars than please share!! Thanks!

http://www.corelle.com/index.asp?pageId=61&cId=1&pId=288

Another question.. I found a set that's cheaper and nice looking.. but it's not green. And my entire kitchen is green stuff. So I don't know which I should go with. Below is a link to the other one.. tell me what you all think. Thanks guys!
http://www.corelle.com/index.asp?pageId=61&pId=302

Answer
The first one is gorgeous and I think it is the one you should purchase for you had mentioned your kitchen is green in color. If you are still searching for more dinnerware you might want to check http://www.lionsdeal.com

Wedding registry- Fine China? Causal China? What's a girl to do??

BUBBLES

OK- this is for all the ladies getting married, have been married that did a registry. I can't decied if I should get fine china or causal chine for my set? Or should I get both? Most registry tell you to get both fine and causal but here are my concerns. 1. Ask for two sets it might split the registry- like I would have to go back and buy all the left overs because I would get half of one set and half of another. 2. Will I really use the Fine China? 3. Will I regret not getting nice china to remember my wedding day? Because I'll never buy it own my own.
I just like know what you did- did you ask for china? Which set and are you happy with it. I just love the fine china, I think it's beautiful and just soo nice. But after the years go by and I have children whom I don't want touching it, is it a waste? I guess I am feeling a little guilty asking for something that's anywhere from $70-100 a place setting, even though I am having a nice wedding.
Is it worth $ for the china?
What I mean by "remember" is basically having a family heirloom that I can pass down to my children and their grandchildren "my wedding china". No one in my family before me had a wedding so my mother and grandmother never had china. Yes, I physically will be able to remember my wedding without china LOL
And Yes, I love my FI and understand that marriage isn't all about china. And I guess I should mention, I am approaching 30 and I do have holidays and dinner parties at my house.

Answer
Id opp for the fine china,as you said you would not buy it for yourself so it would be a cherished gift from your friends and family in celebration of your marriage.
You will use it for special occasions and you will be proud of it. Fine stemware (Chrystel ) is also an option instead of the casual dinnerware,that you can purchase yourself. Good luck in your marriage.Oh and children can be taught as they get older how to not destroy your china or anything else.I bought my daughter at age 2 her own dinner set in Royal Dalton it had bunnies on it and she is now 32 and still has it as a cherished heirloom from her childhood,her child will use it when old enough.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

When they discovered the Titanic wreck did the divers also discover skeletal wrecks of the drowned passengers?

dinnerware set 32 image

colin

Several hundred perished and went down with the Titanic,did the divers ever come across any skeletal remains of the ill fated passengers.
The Pandora sunk in 1795 and skeletal remains were found as given below:
Human remains
"Tom, Dick and Harry"





A facial reconstruction of Harry's skull by Dr Meiya SutisnoThe skeletal remains of three of the 35 men who died in the Pandora shipwreck have been recovered from the wreck so far. Because they have not yet been identified, they have been affectionately called "Tom, Dick and Harry".

Dick has already been re-interred. This was done during a special burial service-by RAN chaplain Mark Wallbank who conducted a service for burial at sea-during the Queensland Museum's 1993 expedition, after which a consecrated obelisk containing Dick's skeletal remains was lowered onto the Pandora wreck site.

One day, a similar ceremony may also be performed for Tom and Harry. However, before this is done it may be possible to identify Tom and Harry through scientific and historical research-which may enable a match-up of DNA extracted from their rem

Answer
For seventy years after the disaster, it was widely believed that the Titanic had sunk intact. Although there were several passengers who insisted that the ship had broken in two as it sank (including Jack Thayer, who even had another passenger draw a set of sketches depicting the sinking for him [61]), the inquiries believed the statements of the ship's officers and first-class passengers that it had sunk in one piece.

In 1985, when the wreck was discovered by Jean-Louis Michel of IFREMER, Robert Ballard and his crew, they found that the ship broke in two as it sank. It was theorised that as the Titanic sank, the stern rose out of the water. It supposedly rose so high that the unsupported weight caused the ship to break into two pieces, the split starting at the upper deck. This became the commonly accepted theory.

In 2005, new evidence suggested that in addition to the expected side damage, the ship also had sustained damage to the bottom of the hull (keel). This new evidence seemed to support a less popular theory that the crack that split the Titanic in two started at the keel plates. Jack Thayerâs sketches support this proposition.


Titanic's bow as seen from the Russian MIR I submersible.The idea of finding the wreck of Titanic and even raising the ship from the ocean floor had been perpetuated since shortly after the ship sank. No attempts even to locate the ship were successful until 1 September 1985, when a joint French-American expedition[62], led by Jean-Louis Michel of IFREMER and Dr Robert Ballard of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, sailing on the Research Vessel Knorr, discovered the wreck using the video camera sled Argo. It was found at a depth of 12,536 feet (3,821 m), south-east of Newfoundland at 41°43â²32â³N, 49°56â²49â³W[63], 13 nautical miles (24 km) from where Titanic was originally thought to rest.

The most notable discovery the team made was that the ship had broken in two, the stern section lying 1,970 feet (600 m) from the bow section and both facing in opposite directions. There had been conflicting witness accounts of whether the ship broke apart on the surface or not, and both the American and British inquiries found that the ship sank intact. Up until the discovery of the wreck, it was generally assumed the ship did not break apart. In 2005, a theory was presented that a portion of Titanic's bottom broke off right before the ship broke in two.[64] The theory was conceived after an expedition sponsored by The History Channel examined the three hull pieces.[65]

The bow section had embedded itself more than 60 feet (18 m) into the silt on the ocean floor. Although parts of the hull had buckled, the bow was mostly intact, as the water inside had equalised with the increasing water pressure. The stern section was in much worse condition. As the stern section sank, water pushed out the air inside tearing apart the hull and decks. The speed at which the stern hit the ocean floor caused even more damage. Surrounding the wreck is a large debris field, with pieces of the ship (including a large amount of coal), furniture, dinnerware and personal items scattered over one square mile (2.6 km²). Softer materials, like wood and carpet, were devoured by undersea organisms, as were human remains.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers